US Vessel Response Plans – Salvage and Marine Firefighting Requirements Final Rule – 31 December 2008 (Deadline for implementation – 22 February 2011)
3 September 2010 No.10-010
| This circular applies to owners of tank vessels carrying oil calling at US ports | |||
| 1. | Salvage agreements | ||
| Members are referred to Circular No.09-002 dated 22 June 2010 titled "Vessel Response Plans (VRPs) - Conformity with International Group Guidelines & Other Recent Developments" in which attention was drawn to the US Coast Guard (USCG) Final Rule amending the Vessel Response Plan (VRP) Salvage and Marine Firefighting requirements for tank vessels carrying oil (33 CFR part 155). This final rule became effective on 30 January 2009 and states that owners of tank vessels calling at US ports must enter into agreements with salvage and marine firefighting services and list these in the VRPs for such vessels. Owners and operators who are required to have a VRP now have until 22 February 2011 to prepare and submit revised plans that comply with these new salvage and marine firefighting requirements. Such amended plans can be filed from 1 September 2010. It is emphasised that unlike the position with regard to Oil Spill Response Organisations which are classified by the USCG, it is the responsibility of the shipowner or operator to ensure that the salvor and firefighter have capability measured against 15 criteria, and to certify to this effect.The criteria are listed in Annex 2.Owners and salvors have raised a number of questions concerning the Final Rule. The USCG has published FAQs and these are updated from time to time. | |||
| 2. | Final Rule | ||
| The Final Rule establishes new response times, requirements for each of the required salvage and marine firefighting services, establishes criteria for vetting salvage and marine firefighting service resource providers, and ensures that salvors and marine firefighters are adequate to provide the equipment and manpower needed for responding to incidents up to and including worst case scenarios. | |||
| The owner must file for a temporary waiver if the response times cannot be met. | |||
| 3. | Contract and Funding Agreement | ||
| The agreement must be by contract (or other approved means). The contract should expressly provide that the resource provider (Salvor) is capable of, and intends to commit to, meeting the plan requirements. As part of the contract the owners must enter into a written funding agreement. The purpose of a funding agreement is to ensure that salvage and marine firefighting responses are not delayed due to funding negotiations at the time of an incident. The funding agreement must include a statement of how long the agreement remains in effect, and must be provided to the US Coast Guard for VRP approval. The USCG has indicated that it will accept Lloyd's Open Form (LOF) with certain conditions (see Annex 3). In effect this would seem to amount to LOF plus SCOPIC. | |||
| Although not primarily a matter relating to P&I cover, the International Group (IG) has drawn up a set of guidelines for evaluating these agreements and these are attached as Annex 1.These relate to such matters as indemnities, control, insurance etc. Against the background of these guidelines the VRP Working Group of the IG has reviewed four Salvor agreements namely those of: | |||
|
|
DonjonSmit - Version 7 June 2010 | ||
|
|
MRA - Marine Response Alliance, LLC Dated 2 August 2010 | ||
|
|
Resolve - Dated 14 June 2010 | ||
|
|
T&T Bisso - OPA 90 Ship Agreement Non- US - 22 April 2010 | ||
| T&T Bisso - OPA 90 Ship Agreement US Owners - 15 June 2010 | |||
| We can confirm that these agreements conform with the guidelines. These salvors have also informed the VRP Working Group that the USCG has reviewed their agreements and stated that they meet the funding agreement requirements. The Salvors have been provided with letters from the USCG to this effect. | |||
| In addition the IG has commissioned a comparison of the rates in these agreements.This comparison is attached as Annex 4.These are provided purely for information purposes. | |||
| As will be seen the structures of these agreements show considerable variation and therefore the comparison is only illustrative. Members should refer to individual salvors for a comprehensive list of all rates and services. | |||
| Members are advised to consult their property underwriters with regard to selection of any particular contract/funding agreement and to check with the salvors that they are able to provide resources meeting the 15 criteria in all the geographic areas of the United States which their ships will visit. | |||
| All Clubs in the International Group of P&I Clubs have issued similar circulars. | |||
| Annex: | 1. | International Group Guidelines for Inspection of Salvor Contracts in US VRPs (Not Wreck removal) | |
| 2. | 33 CFR part 15.4050 - Ensuring that the salvors and marine fire fighters are adequate | ||
| 3. | Contract and Funding Agreements | ||
| 4. | IG Rate Comparison - Technical Comparison of Contract terms | ||
Most read News
- Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on the Prevention and Control of Marine Pollution from Ships (No.4)
- US Vessel Response Plans – Salvage and Marine Firefighting Requirements Final Rule – 31 December 2008 (Deadline for implementation – 22 February 2011) Vo.2 (update)
- International Group of P&I Clubs – Review by EU Commission